![]() ![]() ![]() One thing I would alsoĬonsider if I were you is the availability of using something like "VMotion" to consider in an emergency situation as well.Īnyway, I could go on and on. Will Microsoft give you crap for it? Sure. Will this work? I'm sure people have them working and zero complains. Intervention in the event of a DC level issue. Basically what you have here is what I would call a "Fantasy Pool." A Skype pool that never goes down, can be patched at anytime, and requires little administrative In enterprise level Skype, the Master is backed SQL and front ends store replicas.īelieve me, I get the data center split more than most as we are the same way. The CMS (central management store) should be located on a back-end SQL instance somewhere. Take a looks a requirements for stuff like WebEx and then add on what Skype does in addition and the picture comes into focus. My experience with virtual servers (since folks seem to think you can under-power requirements and haveĭynamic resources) has been a very inadequate one but to compensate, it is possible to build wide instead of up. Last I checked, mixing virtual and physical is also unsupported, again, should be fine but utilization matters when doing real time voice. That said, if your latency is below the acceptable threshold (really the same as server to server in the same DC, but maybe a One pool spanned across data-centers is unsupported, yes even if you have data-centers within 5 miles and dual 10G links. There are a few things I'd like for you to consider since this is a design: Hello, I will do my best to answer your question. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |